Re: Vote for the winner of WSM 2008 i can imagine how being wsm and attracting fame like he does could turn an already slightly arrogant guy into an outright wanker. 11-Sep-2008, 08:35 PM #8. Introduced in 1999. Features shorter length of pull and shorter barrel length than Hunter model. Offered in.22 Hornet,.22-250, 7mm-08,.308,.243 and.260 calibers. Weight about 6 lbs. In 2003,.270 WSM, 7mm WSM and.300 WSM calibers were added for this model as well as left-hand version. NOTE: Add $30 for left-hand; $30 for WSM calibers.
Wsm 1996
I'm considering getting a .270 WSM in either the Kimber Montana or the Classic.
Can anyone tell me if there's any noticable difference in the recoil between the .270 Win and the .270 WSM in these rigs?
How about muzzle blast. Any difference there?
My biggest reason for considering the .270 WSM is the shorter action, overall length, and slightly lighter than the .270 Win.
I have a 84M in .260 that I absolutely love, but my wife has claimed it now! (Plus it's a good excuse for another rifle!)
Thanks in advance...
Can anyone tell me if there's any noticable difference in the recoil between the .270 Win and the .270 WSM in these rigs?
How about muzzle blast. Any difference there?
My biggest reason for considering the .270 WSM is the shorter action, overall length, and slightly lighter than the .270 Win.
I have a 84M in .260 that I absolutely love, but my wife has claimed it now! (Plus it's a good excuse for another rifle!)
Thanks in advance...